Few of the testimonials we have received:
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY FORM- Year 2006
Date: Dec 28,2006
Customer Name: EMM Labs Inc.
Customer Address: Calgary Alberta Canada
Person Filling the form: Susan Meitner
Designation: Owner
Interaction Nature:
Area |
Wtg |
Exc |
VG |
G |
Av |
P |
Remarks |
Relationship |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Response to Communication |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Sometimes it does take time for response |
Relevance of communication |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
Krish always has an answer |
Problem solving |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Pro-activeness |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Willingness to add value |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Language and Etiquette |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Cost of procurement |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price of parts procured |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Transport used |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Credit enjoyed |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Samples cost |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Quality |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceptance as received |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Acceptance while assembly |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Warranty Performance |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Complaint handling |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Delivery |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offer against RFQ |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Samples |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Schedule adherence |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Flexibility in schedule acceptance |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Experience |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easy to do business with |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Chances of continued business |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Chances of additional Business |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfaction level Keys: Ex- Excellent; VG- Very Good; G- Good; Av- Average; P- Poor
Note: We have allotted maximum mark allowed for a category of Measure and sub measures are indicated for which you can fix the marks with total not exceeding the max. Marks for the category.
If there is any remark that is Excellent or Poor, we will appreciate if you can indicate in the remark why you felt so.
Please indicate the mark for each sub-activity and mark ‘ x ’ against the satisfaction level.